Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Zeel Desai vs Jia Qi Kang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Desai vs Kang analysis and find out who is favored!
Zeel Desai vs Jia Qi Kang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Desai 1 - 1 Kang
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Desai has won 41.04% of points on their second serve, while Kang has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Desai, in recent form, has won 56.02% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kang has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.77% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Desai has saved 45.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kang has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Desai has won 57.63% of matches played (W/L 34/ 25), with Kang winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Desai has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 29/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Kang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 21/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 129/ 120).
- Player level: In the last year, Desai has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.75% of matches (W/L 22/ 10), where as Kang has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Desai winning 1 times and Kang being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Desai winning 2 and Kang winning 3. The last match between Desai and Kang was at the W25 Nonthaburi, 04-02-2020, Q3, Hard with Jia Qi Kang getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Desai and Kang have played a deciding set 0 times, with Desai winning 0 times and Kang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Desai winning 1, and Kang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Desai has played against opponents with an average rank of 211.47 while Kang has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Desai has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kang has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Desai has converted 48.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kang has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
600
Rank
511
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
341
High
26
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
58% (180-131)
Career Total W/L
54% (158-137)
44% (12-15)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$5,198
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Zeel Desai | Jia Qi Kang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 14 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:0 | 1:36:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (81/121) | 54% (66/123) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 52% (42/81) | 67% (44/66) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (15/40) | 47% (27/57) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 61% (11/18) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (52/123) | 53% (64/121) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Zeel Desai
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
| 1-6 7-6(6) 4-0 ret. |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Jia Qi Kang
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
86)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
6
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
50%
(
39 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Zeel Desai | Jia Qi Kang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (12/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (27/34) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (256/285) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 46% (12/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 18 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.42 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 111 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:14 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 185.96 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1131/1735) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (614/1131) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (251/604) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (123/251) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (866/1810) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 36% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 46% (12/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (16/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Zeel Desai Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Samira De Stefano
Player
Zeel Desai
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
44 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
52 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Sara Dols
72%
(
76 of
105)
1st Serve %
78%
(
51 of
65)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
28%
(
8 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
52 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Alexandra Iordache
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
103)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
28 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
103)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
1-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daria Khomutsianskaya
Player
Zeel Desai
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Maria Herazo Gonzalez
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Lan Mi
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
86%
(
96 of
111)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
46 of
96)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
47%
(
50 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
58 of
111)
114
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Camilla Zanolini
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
78%
(
77 of
99)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
52 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vaishnavi Adkar
Player
Zeel Desai
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Merna Refaat
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yujin Ahn
Player
Zeel Desai
69%
(
67 of
97)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
46 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jia Qi Kang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Indy De Vroome
Player
Jia Qi Kang
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
11
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
47
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Tara Moore
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
13
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Naho Sato
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Ayaka Okuno
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
6
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
5-7 6-2 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bibiane Schoofs
Player
Jia Qi Kang
66%
(
79 of
120)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
115)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
74)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
50 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
115)
117
Total Points Won
118
|
3-6 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Zeel Desai
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Miyabi Inoue
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 2-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Robu Kajitani
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Desai Vs Kang Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
